Ridge v. Gold
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Sconiers and Whalen, JJ.
(dissenting). We respectfully dissent. In our view, Supreme Court properly denied the motion of Jay Braymiller (defendant) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against him inasmuch as defendant failed to meet his initial burden of establishing that the doctrine of collateral estoppel bars plaintiffs action against him.
There is no question that the doctrine of collateral estoppel “gives preclusive effect” to the determination of a quasi-judicial agency like the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) as long as “two basic conditions are met: (1) the issue sought to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Staatsburg Water Co. v. Staatsburg Fire DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Jeffreys v. GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Halyalkar v. Board of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Rigopolous v. American Museum of Natural HistoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Russo v. IrwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.