Russo v. Irwin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
Petitioner and respondent are the parents of a daughter (bom in 1986). The marriage between the parties was terminated by judgment of divorce on December 16, 1988 and, as part of a *1040property settlement agreement incorporated into the judgment of divorce, petitioner agreed to pay $65 per week for the support of the child. Sometime in late 1991, the parties reconciled and began residing together as a family and sharing assets. Petitioner claims that, shortly after the parties reconciled, respondent informed him that child support was unnecessary because the parties were residing together as a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- D'Arata v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Buechel v. BainNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Staatsburg Water Co. v. Staatsburg Fire DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Jeffreys v. GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Halyalkar v. Board of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Derrick H. v. Martha J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Hastie v. TokleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Bonner v. LynottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Yarinsky v. YarinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of Kaori (Omar J.--Shalette S.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.