Legal Opinion

Tottenhoff v. Rocky Mountain Construction Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1980No. 5237PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Chief Justice.

The basic question in this case is whether the plaintiff-appellant has a valid mechanic’s lien against real property upon which the defendant-appellee bank has a mortgage. The district court held that the claimant’s Notice of Lien was prematurely filed and is invalid and unenforceable under the provisions of § 29-2-109, W.S.1977, which provided that “ * * * the original contractor shall not file a lien prior to the expiration of sixty (60) days after the completion of his contract * *

The issues are:

1. Is the appellant an original contractor or subcontractor?

2. Did the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arch Sellery, Inc. v. SimpsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
  2. American Buildings Co. v. Wheelers StoresWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Jordan v. Natrona Lumber Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Arch Sellery, Inc. v. SimpsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Sawyer v. SawyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aetna Insurance Co. v. LythgoeWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hamel v. American Continental Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. KM Upstream, LLC v. Elkhorn Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Foster Lumber Co., Inc. v. HumeWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. White v. Diamond International Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API