Legal Opinion

Hamel v. American Continental Corp.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1986No. 85-150PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Justice, Retired.

The district court, on motion, dismissed a mechanic’s lien foreclosure action brought by the 24 appellants, employees of Patrick Earl Glaspie, d/b/a Western Comfort Builders (Glaspie), discharged in bankruptcy. Glaspie had contracted to do work for American Continental Corporation (American), d/b/a Medema Homes, appellee owner, on the land of American.

Appellants set out the issues to be:

“1. IS THE CONTRACTOR A PARTY WHO MUST BE JOINED AS A PARTY TO A MECHANICnS LIEN FORECLOSURE ACTION, AS AN INDES-PENSIBLE [sic] PARTY AND WHO, THEREFORE, CAUSES A STAY OF PROCEEDINGS…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Charles Holtkamp and Holtkamp Farms, Inc., Debtors-Appellants. Charles Holtkamp and Holtkamp Farms, Inc. v. Ronald E. LittlefieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. True v. Hi-Plains Elevator MacHinery, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Royal Truck & Trailer, Inc. v. Armadora Maritima Salvadorena, S.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
  4. Varisco v. Oroweat Food Co. (In Re Varisco)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1981
  5. Fintel v. Oregon (In Re Fintel)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Miller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Robbins v. South Cheyenne Water & Sewage DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  4. KM Upstream, LLC v. Elkhorn Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Diamond Hill Investment Co v. SheldenWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API