Legal Opinion

Seanlim Yith v. Kirstjen Nielsen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2018No. 16-15858PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IKUTA, Circuit Judge

Seanlim and Seak Leang Yith appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their complaint requesting adjudication of their naturalization applications pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b). Relying on 8 U.S.C. § 1429, the district court concluded that the Yiths were precluded from obtaining any relief because they were concurrently in removal proceedings. See 8 U.S.C. § 1429 (providing that “no application for naturalization shall be considered by the Attorney General if there is pending against the applicant a removal proceeding pursuant to a warrant of arrest issued…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hafils Akpovi v. David DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  2. Dilone v. NielsenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  3. Yith v. NielsenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  4. M & T Farms v. Federal Crop Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  5. Adesida v. TrittenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API