Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Winters

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district' court for Clay county. Tried below before Morris, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

This is an action of forcible entry and detainer brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff to recover the possession of the north-east quarter of section 28, township 7, range 7, in Clay county. The case was commenced before a justice of the peace, and an appeal taken from his judgment to the district court, where a verdict was returned in favor of the defendant in error and judgment rendered thereon.

*720The first objection is that the notice to quit is not sufficient. It is as follows:

“NOTICE TO QUIT.
“ To Arthur Cummings—

' “ I hereby notify you to leave the premises…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. HurfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Stephens v. . VromanNew York Court of Appeals · 1857

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Devine v. BurlesonNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Bishop v. SpauldingNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Pulliam v. Capital Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API