Legal Opinion
Minter v. District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 29, 2015No. 14-7118PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge GARLAND.
GARLAND, Chief Judge:
Appellant Penelope Minter sued the District of Columbia for alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the District. We affirm.
I
Minter suffered from sarcoidosis and related sarcoid arthritis that made it difficult for her to maintain a regular forty-hours-per-week work schedule. At a meeting in September 2006, she asked her employer, the District of Columbia Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME), about working a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gary Hamilton v. Timothy GeithnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Adeyemi v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Linda Solomon v. Thomas VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Henry Oviedo v. WMATACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Stephanie Waggel v. George Washington UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Townsend v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Brien Hill v. Associates for Renewal in EducationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Shinabargar v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.