Legal Opinion
Brien Hill v. Associates for Renewal in Education
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 27, 2018No. 15-7064PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion filed by Circuit Judge Wilkins.
Wilkins, Circuit Judge:
This is an Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") employment case. Plaintiff Brien Hill is a single-leg amputee who taught in defendant Associates for Renewal in Education's ("ARE's") afterschool program. The District Court granted partial summary judgment for ARE on two of Hill's claims, which he now appeals. Three other claims went to trial, where Hill was awarded damages for ARE's failure to accommodate his disability by refusing his request to teach on a lower floor. The primary issues on appeal are whether ARE also…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Brigid Ford v. Marion County Sheriff's OfficCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Exby-Stolley v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Teddy Beasley v. O'Reilly Auto PartsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
- Lexyington McIntyre v. Eugene School District 4jCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Tudor v. Whitehall Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.