Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Larocco

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 28, 1933No. 5223PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

Tony Larocco, husband of tho plaintiff, had been employed by the Pittsburgh Screw & Bolt Corporation. That concern had taken out two policies of group life insurance with tho defendant insurance company; one, a gratuity between itself and its employees, was a non-eontributory policy, that is, a policy whereunder the premiums were paid by the Screw & Bolt Corporation wholly from its own funds; the other, a contributory policy, whereunder the premiums, though formally paid by tho Screw & Bolt Corporation, were made up of moneys partly contributed by the Corporation and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Wardlaw v. . Mayor, Etc., New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Williams v. VreelandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
  5. McNamara v. . the Mayor, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colantonio v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Butler County Court of Common Pleas · 1951
  2. Perry v. Middle Atlantic Lumbermens Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Pennsylvania Slovak Roman & Greek Catholic Union v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  4. Perry v. MIDDLE ATL. LUMBERMENS ASS'NSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Staub v. General American Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API