Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Larocco
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
Tony Larocco, husband of tho plaintiff, had been employed by the Pittsburgh Screw & Bolt Corporation. That concern had taken out two policies of group life insurance with tho defendant insurance company; one, a gratuity between itself and its employees, was a non-eontributory policy, that is, a policy whereunder the premiums were paid by the Screw & Bolt Corporation wholly from its own funds; the other, a contributory policy, whereunder the premiums, though formally paid by tho Screw & Bolt Corporation, were made up of moneys partly contributed by the Corporation and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Wardlaw v. . Mayor, Etc., New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Williams v. VreelandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- McNamara v. . the Mayor, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
3Cited by5 opinions
- Colantonio v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Butler County Court of Common Pleas · 1951
- Perry v. Middle Atlantic Lumbermens Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Pennsylvania Slovak Roman & Greek Catholic Union v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
- Perry v. MIDDLE ATL. LUMBERMENS ASS'NSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Staub v. General American Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1990