Legal Opinion

Hartshorn v. Gelston

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1805PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PENDLETON,

moved for a struck jury in this suit, which Was fot erecting a beacon on the plaintiffs’ lands at Sandy-Hooki> after being warned not to do so, on an affidavit, stating, a for5met action and recovery for the same offence, the pendency of two suits for a continuance of the original trespass, and that the defendant was, as he verily believed, reimbursed by the govern ment of the United States, for the damages paid in the first action, and would be indemnified by them, against any recovered in the present, or other suits. These circumstances and the probability that the genernl…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. McGuireNew York Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Schuster v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Walsh v. Sun Mutual InsuranceThe Superior Court of New York City · 1864

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API