Legal Opinion
Black Ball Freight Service, Inc. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1968No. 39600PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County affirming a grant of authority by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (hereinafter referred to as WUTC) to PoulsboSeattle Auto Freight, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Poulsbo-Seattle), to serve south Kitsap County 1 from Seattle with “regular route, scheduled service” by motor carrier. The WUTC action was an extension of Poulsbo-Seattle’s already existing permit to serve as a regularly scheduled motor carrier between north Kitsap County and Seattle.
The appellant, Black Ball Freight Service, Inc.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lang Transp. Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
- Atlanta-New Orleans Motor Freight Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1961
- Inland Motor Freight v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1941
- Herrett Trucking Co. v. Washington Public Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Sloan's Moving & Storage Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Inland Empire Distribution Systems, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Milne Truck Lines, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Morey v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Stowers & Sons Trucking Co. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Farm Supply Distributors, Inc. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.