Legal Opinion

Ian Lockhart v. Deanna Brookhart, Jeremiah Brown, and Christopher Easton

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided November 12, 2025No. 3:25-cv-01033Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS IAN LOCKHART, #R18787, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 3:25-cv-01033-RJD ) DEANNA BROOKHART, ) JEREMIAH BROWN, and ) CHRISTOPHER EASTON, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DALY, Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Ian Lockhart brings this action pro se pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc, et seq., for the alleged interference with his religious exercise at Lawrence Correctional Center.1 He seeks monetary and injunctive relief. The Complaint (Doc. 2)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Rodriguez v. Plymouth Ambulance ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. David Brown v. Timothy BudzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. James H. Higgason, Jr. v. Robert A. Farley, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API