Esprit De Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Esprit de Corp (“Esprit”), asserts that the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) improperly appraised footwear imported from the People’s Republic of China. Esprit contends that the differential between air and sea freight charges, reimbursed by the manufacturer after the date of importation, should have been deducted from the transaction value before assessment of duties. The government argues that Customs properly excluded the differential reimbursement pursuant to 19 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Allied International v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- Century Importers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Cutter & Buck, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997