Legal Opinion

Estate of Stickney

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 2, 1951No. Civ. 4227PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

In this probate proceeding five sheets of paper found in an envelope with other papers, in a desk in decedent’s residence, were offered for probate as the holographic will of Ida A. Stickney, deceased.

A trial was had without a jury and the court found that the offered document was not the last will and testament of Ida A. Stickney; that the alleged will had been altered, torn and cancelled by the decedent with the intent and for the purpose of revoking it; that the said instrument is not, and was not, intended by the decedent to be her last will and testament.

The instrument presented as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Estate of SargavakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Estate of TrefrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. In Re Estate of HewittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cuneo v. MondaniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Harrison v. City National Bank of Clinton, IowaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1962
  3. Treaster v. HamlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Estate of NielsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Matter of Estate of CraddockMontana Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API