Legal Opinion

Bunker Hill & S. Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Empire State Idaho Mining & Developing Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho

Decided May 4, 1900No. 138PublishedCited by 3 opinions

At Law. Action to determine mining rights.

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, District Judge.

The question involved in this action is the right of possession of or title to an underground portion of a mineral-bearing ledge, which is claimed by plaintiff through its own*190ership of the Stemwinder mining claim, and by defendants through their ownership of the Last Chance and Emma mining claims. It involves the settlement of an underground mining conflict based upon surface rights. The mining law, as authoritatively interpreted, proves in many cases most cruel to important mining interests. Priority has become the chief element of value in a mining location. However…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Last Chance Mining Co. v. Tyler Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Del Monte Mining & Milling Co. v. Last Chance Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Walrath v. Champion Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Last Chance Min. Co. v. Tyler Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho · 1903
  2. Gallagher v. De Lancey Stables Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Round Mountain Mining Co. v. Round Mountain Sphinx Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API