Legal Opinion
Specht v. Waterbury Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Motion for nonsuit.
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
On the trial of this action before the court and a jury, the defendant'moved for a non suit at the end of plaintiff’s case. The motion was denied and the defendant duly excepted. The defendant then produced its witnesses and, at the conclusion of the testimony, renewed its *405motion to dismiss the complaint, and also moved for the direction of a verdict. The trial judge reserved decision on the motions and announced that he would take a special verdict under .the Code of Civil Procedure, section 1187. Certain questions in writing were prepared and submitted to the jury bearing upon the questions…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- McDonald v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Walsh v. Fitchburg RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Larmore v. . Crown Point Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Travell v. . BannermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wozniczka v. McKEANIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- Gilligan v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1946
- Eason v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1951
- Nugent v. Jangaldi Building & Construction Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1931
- Specht v. Waterbury Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911