Legal Opinion
Kozusko v. Garretson
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided September 30, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, J.
Prosecutors apply for a writ of certiorari to bring up a resolution appearing in the minutes of the board of aldermen of April 19th, 1936, which resolution presecutors claim was not lawfully adopted.
It appears that a full board of aldermen consists of seven members, one being altermen-at-large. That was the number on January 1st, 1936, when the board held its organization meeting, adopted rules, and appointed committees. One of those rules was that "all committees shall be appointed by a majority vote of all the members of the board.”
Before…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. BallinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
3Cited by8 opinions
- Babyak v. AltenOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- Aurentz v. Planning Board of Little Egg HarborNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Martin v. BallingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Aurentz v. PLANNING BD., TP., LITTLE EGG HARBORNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Garner v. Mountainside Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.