State of Rio De Janeiro of the Federative Republic of Brazil v. Philip Morris Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID B. GAULTNEY, Justice.
Rio de Janeiro of the Federative Republic of Brazil filed this lawsuit in the district court of Angelina County, Texas, against various nonresident defendants in an effort to recoup billions of dollars expended on healthcare because of smoking-related illnesses. The trial court found it did not have jurisdiction over the defendants and granted the special appearance motions of Philip Morris, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Lorillard Tobacco Company, B.A.T. Industries, p.l.c., and Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation. Rio appealed. See Tex. Civ. Prac. &…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Ruiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Deloitte & Touche Netherlands Antilles & Aruba v. Ulrich, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
- Deloitte & Touche Netherlands Antilles and Aruba and Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu v. Hans Jurgen Gustavo Ulrich, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
- Scotty Wales, Adam Stout and CAS Enterprise-Venture, VI, LLC v. Paul Ruppert, Innovative Resources Enterprises, LLC and Innovative Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2018
- State of Rio De Janeiro of the Federative Republic of Brazil v. Philip Morris Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.