Legal Opinion

State v. Mackey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1885PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Josephine County. Defendants appeal. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

The defendants, father and son, were indicted jointly and tried jointly for the crime of murder, found guilty, and sentenced to be hanged. The bill of exceptions purports to contain, in substance, the whole testimony, and the first point suggested is the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. This alleged error applies to the denial of the defendants’ motion for a new trial. There are cases in which it has been *156held that a motion for a new trial is addressed to the sound discretion, of the court below, and that the overruling of such a motion will not be reviewed unless there…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pomeroy's Lessee v. State Bank of Ind.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
  2. Brown v. LordOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  3. State v. FitzhughOregon Supreme Court · 1867
  4. People v. DickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. State v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. Foot YouOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. State v. FarnamOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State v. WestonOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. McBride v. Northern Pacific R. R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  5. State v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API