Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From Union : Robert Eakin, Judge. James Hill appealed from a conviction of the crime of horse stealing.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

The defendant, James Hill, was tried upon an information charging him with the larceny of a mare, the property of one D. H. Shaffer, alleged to have been committed in Union County, Oregon, August 2, 1899 ; and, having been convicted thereof, he was sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of two years, from which judgment he appeals.

Exceptions having been reserved, it is contended that the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury as re*91quested by the defendant as follows: “(2) If you find from the evidence that the defendant had a claim to the mare, honestly entertained,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  2. State v. Foot YouOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. State v. MagersOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Giachetta v. MarquamOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  5. State v. PomeroyOregon Supreme Court · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Larson v. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Goldfoot v. LofgrenOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State of Oregon v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. In Re Estate of TA StollOregon Supreme Court · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API