In Re the Estate of Crouse
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.
Small causes establish great principles but no great principle is to be established in this contest over the meager estate of a tenant farmer. The only question is whether the testator so expressed his intention to make provision for his wife, son and grandson that the law can determine such intention and apply well-known rules to give it legal effect. The right to litigate is common to rich and poor but a disposition to adjust family differences without litigation, although resulting is mutual sacrifices of asserted legal rights, might have kept this controversy out of the courts. It is now…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crawford v. . McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- McCorn v. . McCornNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Cowenhoven v. . BallNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Kemp v. DandisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by27 opinions
- In re the Estate of SmallmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- In re the Estate of AndersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of BenjaminNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re the Estate of BurrNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- In re the Estate of GaveyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.