Legal Opinion

Chrysler Corp. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided September 27, 1940No. Docket No. 97305Published

1. In order to reduce labor turnover and enable its employees to become stockholders, petitioner established a successive series of employees' savings and investment plans, each plan maturing four years after the year of its establishment. For each dollar contributed by an employee, petitioner contributed 50 cents.

Read the full summary

1. In order to reduce labor turnover and enable its employees to become stockholders, petitioner established a successive series of employees' savings and investment plans, each plan maturing four years after the year of its establishment. For each dollar contributed by an employee, petitioner contributed 50 cents. The contributions were used to buy stock, which was segregated in the names of petitioner's agents and, together with cash on hand, was distributed pro rata to participants on maturity dates. Withdrawing employees received only the amounts of their contributions plus interest.…

1Opinion of the Court

CHRYSLER CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Chrysler Corp. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 97305.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

42 B.T.A. 795; 1940 BTA LEXIS 950;

September 27, 1940, Promulgated

1. In order to reduce labor turnover and enable its employees to become stockholders, petitioner established a successive series of employees' savings and investment plans, each plan maturing four years after the year of its establishment. For each dollar contributed by an employee, petitioner contributed 50 cents. The contributions were used to buy stock, which was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. General Utilities & Operating Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. v. SmietankaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API