Legal Opinion

Jason Zappacosta & Joy Godowski v. Cozette McAvoy

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 2026No. 24-00087Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: : : Chapter 13 COZETTE MCAVOY, : : : Bankruptcy No. 24-11597-AMC : DEBTOR : : : JASON ZAPPACOSTA & : JOY GODOWSKI, : : PLAINTIFFS : : v. : Adv. Pro. No. 24-00087-AMC : COZETTE MCAVOY, : : DEFENDANT : ____________________________________: OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Jason Zappacosta and Joy Godowski (the “Zappacostas” or “Plaintiffs”) move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (“FRCP 56”)1 for summary judgment on their claim against Defendant Cozette McAvoy (“Defendant,” together with the Zappacostas, the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API