Coddington v. State

LUMPKIN, Judge:

CONCUR IN RESULTS.

¶1 I concur in the results reached in this case but write separately to address several issues.

{ 2 Petitioner violates Rule 8.5(A)(5), Rules of the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals, Title 22, Ch. 18, App. (2011) by setting out sub-propositions. Petitioner's failure to separately set out each proposition waives review of these claims. See Cuesta-Rodriguez v. State, 2011 OK CR 4, ¶ 12, 247 P.3d 1192, 1197.

T3 The opinion does not correctly apply res judicato and waiver to Petitioner's allegations concerning his first trial. "[Cllaims that could have been raised…