Legal Opinion
Iodice v. Archcare At Terence Cardinal Cooke Health Care Center
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 8, 2022No. 1:20-cv-04217Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VINCENT IODICE, Plaintiff, -v.- 20 Civ. 4217 (KPF) ARCHCARE AT TERENCE CARDINAL OPINION AND ORDER COOKE HEALTH CARE CENTER, 1199SEIU UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS EAST, and JANICE ATKINS, Defendants. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: Plaintiff Vincent Iodice brings this action against Defendants Archcare at Terence Cardinal Cooke Health Care Center (“Archcare”), 1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East (the “Union”), and Janice Atkins (“Atkins,” and together with the Union, the “Union Defendants,” and all together, “Defendants”),…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.