Legal Opinion

Cottingham v. Vogt

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 1, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

60 N.J. Super. 576 (1960)

160 A.2d 57

ROBERT COTTINGHAM, SAUL VOGEL AND JULIUS FIELO, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

ELEANOR B. VOGT, CLERK OF THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE, VINCENT CAREY, JOHN M. DUNN, LETRIS MILLER AND ANTHONY GIULIANO, CLERK OF THE COUNTY OF ESSEX, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 28, 1960.

Decided March 29, 1960.

Opinion April 1, 1960.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and FREUND.

Mr. Richard M. Glassner argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Julius Fielo argued the cause for respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Imbrie v. MarshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Stevenson v. GilfertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. George v. GillespieNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. In re the Application for an Order Directing the Borough ClerkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McKinney v. KaminskyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1972
  2. Alston v. MaysNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Gangemi v. RosengardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Goetsch v. PhilhowerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Ivkovich v. GreenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API