Legal Opinion
Gangemi v. Rosengard
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 26, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
44 N.J. 166 (1965)
207 A.2d 665
THOMAS GANGEMI AND MICHAEL R. PERRELLA, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BERNARD ROSENGARD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 1, 1965.
Decided February 26, 1965.
Mr. Telford Taylor, of the District of Columbia and New York Bars argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Jack Geddy Goldberg, attorney).
Mr. T. James Tumulty, Assistant Corporation Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Francis X. Hayes, on the brief; Mr. Meyer Pesin, Corporation Counsel of City of Jersey City,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Schneider v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Two Guys From Harrison, Inc. v. FurmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alongi v. SchatzmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971