Legal Opinion

Huffman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 8, 1909No. 263PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

RAMSEY, Judge.

This was a conviction for malicious mischief, the punishment being assessed at a five dollar fine.

The State relied for a conviction upon the testimony of Ed White, who was a confessed actor and participant with appellant in the crime charged, and equally guilty with him. The only other witness introduced was James Craig, who testified that his milk was polluted, evidencing that someone had done the act charged against appellant. Mr. Craig, however, had no personal knowledge at all concerning appellant’s participation in the offense. The appellant denied the acts charged against…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stevens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Commonwealth v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Latham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Thurman Latham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API