Legal Opinion
Monsivais v. Arbitron, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 5, 2014No. Civil Action No. H-12-3582Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, removed from state court on diversity jurisdiction1 and alleging retaliatory discharge in violation of Chapter 21 of the Texas Labor Code after Plaintiff Ed Monsivais complained that his co-worker and former flaneé, Erika Paez, was sexually harassing him, is Defendant Arbitron, Inc.’s (“Arbitron’s”) motion for summary judgment (instrument # 14).
Standard of Review
Summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c) is appropriate when, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.