Legal Opinion
Harold L. Wakefield v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 7, 1986No. 85-7149PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
On February 10, 1978, the National Labor Relations Board (“Board") issued a decision and order finding, inter alia, that Greyhound Taxi Co. (“Greyhound Taxi”) had violated the National Labor Relations Act because its agents had physically assaulted Harold Wakefield for his union activities, resulting in his constructive discharge. Greyhound Taxi Co., 234 NLRB 865 (1978). The Board’s order required Greyhound Taxi to offer Wakefield reinstatement and to make him whole for any loss of earnings he might have suffered as a result of the company’s unfair labor practices. On…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mercy Peninsula Ambulance Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gibson v. County of Washoe, NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Carole WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Lois E. Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Gibson v. County of Washoe, NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Stanley A. Dash, Jr. v. National Labor Relations Board, Lawyers Co-Operative Publishing Company, Intervenor-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.