Legal Opinion

Ana R. PADILLA v. TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 2010No. M2008-02489-SC-WCM-WCPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 3, 2010 Session ANA R. PADILLA v. TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY Appeal by Permission from the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 07-2647-III Ellen Hobbs Lyle, Chancellor No. M2008-02489-SC-WCM-WC - Filed October 6, 2010 G ARY R. W ADE, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent. A basic principle of the Workers’ Compensation Act (“the Act”) is its remedial purpose.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-116

(2008);1 Trosper v. Armstrong Wood Prods., Inc., 273 S.W.3d 598, 609 n.5 (Tenn. 2008). For years, this…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Lynch v. City of JellicoTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. StevensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Fritts v. Safety National Casualty Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Blankenship v. American Ordnance Systems, LLSTennessee Supreme Court · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API