Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota v. Hellerud

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2006No. 20050354PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REPRIMAND ORDERED.

2Per curiam

[¶ 1] Mark Hellerud objects to a report by a hearing panel of the Disciplinary Board which recommended he be reprimanded, refund fees of $9,220.00, and pay costs of $3,030.25, plus the costs of the transcript for violation of N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.5(a) (excessive fees) & N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.5(b) (not adequately communicating fees). We conclude there is clear and convincing evidence Hellerud negligently violated those rules, and we adopt the hearing panel’s recommendation that Hellerud be reprimanded and pay costs. We disagree with the hearing panel’s recommendation on…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Grievance Commission v. WaltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Matter of Disciplinary Action Against NassifNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. DooleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. WardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against HellerudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. City of Minot v. HellebustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API