Legal Opinion

Sandstone Associates, Inc v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 12, 2019No. 19-900Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims NO. 19-900C (Filed: December 12, 2019) SANDSTONE ASSOCIATES, INC. Plaintiff v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Defendant Ted Del Guercio, III, McManimon, Scotland & Bauman, LLC, of Roseland, New Jersey, for Elizabeth M. Hosford, Assistant Director, and John M. McAdams III, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington D.C. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TAPP, Judge. The United States moves to dismiss Plaintiff Sandstone Associates’ Complaint as time barred by 41 U.S.C. § 7104(b)(3). That motion is GRANTED.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API