Legal Opinion

Fiedler v. Steger

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1986No. 85-185PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Justice.

Appellant Elizabeth Fiedler, seven and one-half months pregnant, who was in fact suffering from appendicitis, and without personal examination, was prescribed an antinausea medication over the telephone by appellee Dr. Steger. Her appendix eventually ruptured and was removed several weeks after she delivered her baby prematurely. In the resulting medical malpractice action against Dr. Steger for misdiagnosis, a motion for summary judgment was sustained, and we will now affirm.

Mrs. Fiedler telephoned her doctor’s office on September 7, 1982, to complain of nausea and other…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anand Prakash v. American UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Yuba Goldfields, Inc. And Placer Service Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. McClellan v. TottenhoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Garner v. HickmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Metzger v. KalkeWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Mostert v. CBL & AssociatesWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Cook v. Shoshone First BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Davenport v. EpperlyWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Roybal v. BellWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API