Legal Opinion
Jackson v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 8, 2009No. 99, 98, September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.
With the filing of this opinion, this Court will have completed a “Goldilocks” trilogy. 1 In Department of Human Resources v. Howard, 397 Md. 353, 918 A.2d 441 (2007), in the context of an in banc proceeding in the Court of Special Appeals, we found that more than 13 judges was too much. In Wildwood Medical Center, L.L.C. v. Montgomery County, 405 Md. 489, 954 A.2d 457 (2008) (per curiam), in the context of a three-judge panel of that court, where the nominal author of the opinion in the case passed-away before a final opinion could be filed and the remaining judges split over the result, we…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Doe v. Montgomery County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- INTERNATIONAL ASS'N OF FIRE FIGHTERS v. Mayor & City Council of CumberlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Department of Human Resources v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Wildwood Medical Center, L.L.C. v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Armstrong v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Tarray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Lovell Land, Inc. v. SHACourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Maryland Department of Environment v. klein/wachter Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 97 OAG 072, Maryland Attorney General Reports2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.