Legal Opinion

Ralph Janvey v. Tonya Dokken

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 11, 2014No. 13-10266, 13-10272, 13-10276, 13-10279PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

In this Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“TUFTA”) case, plaintiff-appellee Ralph S. Janvey, the Receiver for the Stanford entities, seeks to recover funds that were paid to defendants-appellants,- purchasers of certificate of deposits from Stanford International Bank, Ltd., as part of a Ponzi scheme. The district court granted the Receiver’s motion for summary judgment, ordering defendants-appellants to return funds paid in excess of their original investments. Defendants-appellants timely appeal. We AFFIRM.

I

This case stems from the Stanford Ponzi…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. De Aguilar v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Adams v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Klein v. CorneliusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  2. McCaig Ex Rel. Estate of McCaig v. Wells Fargo Bank (Texas), N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  3. Ralph Janvey v. Oreste TonarelliCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  4. Janvey v. Dillon Gage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  5. Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (In re Madoff)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API