Constancio v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted, upon a jury verdict, of rape (former NRS 200.363) and of two counts of the infamous crime against nature (NRS 201.190 as it then read; see 1977 Nev. States, ch. 598, § 17, at 1632). He was acquitted of a charge of first degree kidnapping (NRS 200.310).
1. Appellant first contends that his rights were violated by the failure of the police to apprehend and arraign him for almost a year after the May, 1977 incident upon which the charges were based. To the extent that this issue has not previously been determined by our ruling on appellant’s appeal of a pretrial…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Deutscher v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Theriault v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BaheCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- State v. HartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. HartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986