Legal Opinion

Constancio v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1982No. 12396PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted, upon a jury verdict, of rape (former NRS 200.363) and of two counts of the infamous crime against nature (NRS 201.190 as it then read; see 1977 Nev. States, ch. 598, § 17, at 1632). He was acquitted of a charge of first degree kidnapping (NRS 200.310).

1. Appellant first contends that his rights were violated by the failure of the police to apprehend and arraign him for almost a year after the May, 1977 incident upon which the charges were based. To the extent that this issue has not previously been determined by our ruling on appellant’s appeal of a pretrial…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Deutscher v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Theriault v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BaheCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. State v. HartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. HartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API