Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Shiner

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1968No. Docket 1,385PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLesinski, C. J.

This suit for false imprisonment or illegal arrest was brought by plaintiff, Sandy Dixon, Jr., against defendants, Ronald Shiner and William Schmidt, who are police officers for the city of Detroit. From a judgment granted in favor of plaintiff by the Wayne county circuit court sitting without a jury, defendants appeal.

The gravamen of the complaint set forth that on June 3, 1962, defendants, while on duty as police officers for the city of Detroit, did arrest and detain plaintiff - without a warrant and without probable cause. The defendants in their answer deny that the arrest was unlawful…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Rios v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SandsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Grand Rapids Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of WyomingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Fick v. FickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Dixon v. ShinerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API