State v. Hollman
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentStukes, Chief Justice
I would follow the rule indicated by our former decisions and affirm the sentences which were imposed by the trial court. I agree with the disposition of the other questions which are dealt with in the opinion of Mr. Justice Legge. He cites no decision from any jurisdiction which involved resistance of arrest that is contrary to my view, and I have found none.
The evidence justified the verdict of guilt of the common law offenses of (1) resisting arrest and (2) assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature.
Our former decisions, referred to above, are: State v. Bozven, 17 S. C. 58, in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MobleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- State v. . WraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. RobertsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- State v. . DulaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.