Legal Opinion

Hendricks v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 2017No. ED 104636PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Introduction

KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge

Terrence Hendricks (“Hendricks”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. Hendricks sought relief from his convictions relating to a violent *512home invasion that resulted in the shooting of Ernest Strong (“Ernest”).2 On appeal, Hendricks argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present evidence that a purported eyewitness had previously identified another person, Demar Cotton (“Demar”), as Ernest’s shooter. Because trial counsel’s decision not to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  5. Walter Barton v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Choeye Young v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. Forrest D. Russell v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Jovan Tyler v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API