Legal Opinion

Haines v. Russell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 7, 1932No. 10453PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLooney, J.

On February 8, 1932, judgment was rendered for A. M. Russell against all defendants, including Alma McNeley Haines and C. H. Haines, for the recovery of certain lands; Haines and wife gave notice of appeal, and in an effort to perfect same filed an affidavit in lieu of cost bond on February 20th, and as same was not contested within ten days, said defendants, on March 15, applied to G. P. Gafford, clerk of said court, to make and deliver to them a transcript of the record, which was refused by said officer. These facts are alleged in a motion by defendants, as a showing of good cause why they…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Houston, B. & T. Ry. Co. v. HornbergerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co. v. HornbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Stewart v. Heidenheimer Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Proctor v. San Antonio Street Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. Williams v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coleman v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. Turner v. Atlanta Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Barrera v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Helge v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API