Proctor v. San Antonio Street Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. J. L. Camp.
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO DISMISS.
ELY, Associate Justice.
Plaintiffs in error sued the San Antonio Street Eailway Company for damages, and judgment going against them, sued out this writ of error to this court. It was alleged in the application “that since the rendition of judgment in said cause the charter of the San Antonio Street Eailway Company was canceled by decree of court, and the San Antonio Traction Company has become and is its successor in all things, and has acquired its property and rights and assumed the payment of all its debts, obligations and liabilities,” and citation was asked against…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Graves v. HornTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MurphyTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- City of Indianola v. Gulf, Western Texas & Pacific RailwayTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Stewart v. Heidenheimer Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1881
- King v. GoodsonTexas Supreme Court · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. Kenneth C. BivinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Dobbie v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Gagnon v. St. Maries Light & Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1914
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. LawleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.