Legal Opinion

VANETTEN v. DAIGLE

District Court, D. Maine

Decided June 22, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00291Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE MICHAEL VANETTEN, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) 2:22-cv-00291-JDL ) JUDITH DAIGLE, ARAMARK, and ) YORK COUNTY JAIL ) ) Defendants ) RECOMMENDED DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Plaintiff seeks to recover damages allegedly resulting from several incidents that occurred while he was incarcerated at the York County Jail. (Complaint, ECF No. 1.)1 Plaintiff joined as defendants, York County,2 Aramark, which provided food services at the jail, and Judith Daigle, who worked for Aramark at the jail. Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint.…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API