Legal Opinion
Ardoin v. Stine Lumber Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 29, 2004No. 2003-1547PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JjPICKETT, Judge.
FACTS
This matter arises from a Petition for Damages filed by Eula Guidry Ardoin (the plaintiff) on September 25, 2001, in the Fourteenth Judicial District Court. In that Petition, the plaintiff claimed that in order to construct a wooden deck and ramp at her home, she purchased lumber from Stine Lumber Company and Griffith Lumber Company, Inc. The lumber was treated and/or manufactured with chro-mate copper arsenate (CCA) by L.L. Brewton Lumber Company, Inc. with chemicals manufactured or designed by Osmose, Inc. Plaintiff asserted that the defendants delivered non-conforming…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Joyce R. Lawrence and Caroline Wilson v. Chancery Court of Tennessee Robert E. Corlew, Iii, Chancellor Carol McCoy Chancellor John A.W. Bratcher, Clerk and Master Claudia A. Bonnyman, Clerk and Master Chancery Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District and Chancery Court of the Twentieth Judicial DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Bryant v. PiersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Kaplan v. Missouri Pacific RailroadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cadle Co. v. HensonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Ardoin v. Stine Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004