Legal Opinion

State v. Watts

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 10, 1982No. 10-81-02227, CA A22946PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055. He contends that the trial court should have granted his motion for acquittal on the ground that the state’s case rested solely on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice to the crime charged. The issue is whether that witness was an accomplice. We hold that he was not, and we affirm.

Defendant was convicted in a trial to the court on stipulated facts, which, so far as relevant to this appeal, are as follows:

«* * * [T]he victim * * * was at the Lagoon Campground, Siltcoos outlet in Lane County, Oregon on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HullOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. WinslowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. State v. BowersOregon Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Kotera v. Daioh International U.S.A. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. HarelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. State v. KnutsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API