Legal Opinion

United States v. Roy Condy Woods

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1978No. 77-5100PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENGEL, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Roy Condy Woods was found guilty in a district court jury trial on four separate counts of an indictment charging violations of the narcotics laws. All violations were alleged to have occurred “on or about November 12, 1975, in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.” All involved heroin.

Count 1 charged that Woods, with co-defendants Dale Schnell and Eddie Ray Snyder, possessed with an intent to distribute and aided and abetted each other in the possession with intent to distribute approximately 111.36 grams of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Gore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. Mario Adamo, Richard Marsico, Terry Freeman, Raymond Ripley, Jeffrey Linkous, Ectore Garcia, and Winthrop HongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. United States v. Connie Clark (90-3153) and Cliffton Clark (90-3312)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Marcos L. Anderson, A/K/A Marcos Loinas AndersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API