State v. Dieterle, C-070796 (4-24-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON RECONSIDERATION.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Ryan Dieterle, appeals convictions for aggravated murder under R.C. 2903.01(B), aggravated burglary under R.C. 2911.11(A)(1), rape under R.C. 2907.02(A)(2), and violation of an anti-stalking protection order under R.C. 2919.27(A). We find no merit in his five assignments of error, and we affirm the trial court's judgment.
I. Facts
{¶ 2} Evidence presented at a jury trial showed that Dieterle and his wife, Michelle, began having marital problems after Michelle was kidnapped, robbed, and raped by an armed stranger. They eventually separated,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Jordan v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. LukacsOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. HendrixOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. LongOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. KhamsiOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. SimpsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.