Legal Opinion
State v. Lukacs
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 28, 2010No. Nos. C-090309 and C-090310PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dinkelacker, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Christopher Lukács, appeals convictions for three counts of rape under R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b), one count of rape under R.C. 2907.02(A)(2), one count of felonious assault under R.C. 2903.11(A)(1), and one count of failure to verify his address under R.C. 2950.06. We find no merit in his 13 assignments of error, and we affirm his convictions.
I. Confrontation and Hearsay
{¶ 2} In his first and second assignments of error, Lukács contends that the trial court erred by admitting numerous statements because they were inadmissible hearsay. He also contends…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. BolesOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. WoltersOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. ErkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.