Clark v. Esser
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT AND THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, members of a political caucus known as “rank and file teamsters” or “RAFT” within Teamsters Local 243, instituted this action against Defendants, members of a political caucus known as “Esser-Cinci” within Local 243 and Local 243 itself, claiming that Defendants deprived Plaintiffs of their right to free expression, as protected by the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (“LMRDA,” or…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Alo, LLC v. Sean Fang, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Dunsmore v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Jacobs v. AlamDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- NumberAI Inc. v. John DoeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 102.129.252.38District Court, N.D. California · 2025
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.