Legal Opinion

Township of West Windsor v. Nierenberg

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 30, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

150 N.J. 111 (1997)

695 A.2d 1344

TOWNSHIP OF WEST WINDSOR IN THE COUNTY OF MERCER, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

YVETTE NIERENBERG AND PRINCETON MANOR ASSOCIATES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 4, 1996.

Decided June 30, 1997.

Edward D. McKirdy argued the cause for appellant Yvette Nierenberg (McKirdy and Riskin, attorneys).

Andrew J. Rothman argued the cause for appellant Princeton Manor Associates (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin & Davis, attorneys).

Richard L. Rudin argued the cause for respondent (Weiner Lesniak,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  5. United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API